Re: This would have been interesting
- From: Toon <toon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:20:36 -0800
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:28:03 +0530, santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
BTW, Voldemort is described by Dumbledore at several points in the story
as being one of the most magically gifted and talented wizard ever. I
wonder why he could not recreate the Philosopher's Stone to achieve
immortality? Seems safer and less "destructive" than ripping your soul
into Horcruxes.
Far easier to destroy the Stone than a Horcrux. The Stone would need
to be hidden but easily accessed for continued use. A Horcrux can be
left alone for decades.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: DaveD
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: santosh
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: remysun2000
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: Rubeus Hagrid
- Re: This would have been interesting
- References:
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: Louis Epstein
- Re: This would have been interesting
- From: santosh
- Re: This would have been interesting
- Prev by Date: Re: Things I would like to ak JKR
- Next by Date: Re: This would have been interesting
- Previous by thread: Re: This would have been interesting
- Next by thread: Re: This would have been interesting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|