Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- From: Toon <toon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:00:01 -0800
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:33:17 GMT, "DaveD"
<davedn1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From DH, it sounds to me like Harry was in a fairly similar place in theKings Cross scene and could choose which way to go - follow Dd all the way
into proper death, or return to full life though without needing the
cauldron and bone of his father. So perhaps where Voldy had been living a
half-life, Harry was in a half-death, which was sufficient to sever Voldy's
soulpiece removing the near-horcrux. Had Voldy not had Harry's blood in his
veins then Harry would have fully died which would also have removed the
soulpiece but because of his blood, he could come back.
I think the bone of father bit was for a new body, which I think was
destroyed in the explosion. Had there been none, the body would have
been fine, and V mighta gone back into it.
.
- References:
- Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- From: Lyle Francis Delp
- Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- From: Thom Madura
- Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- From: Richard Eney
- Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- From: Thom Madura
- Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- From: Richard Eney
- Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- From: DaveD
- Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- Prev by Date: Re: DH and other HP Movies
- Next by Date: Re: death penalty
- Previous by thread: Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- Next by thread: Re: Harry was NOT a Horcrux - Evidence in canon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
