Re: four houses, four horcruxes

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:42:44 -0800 (PST), Sirius Kase
<SiriusKase@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 5, 9:20 am, Toon <t...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:26:26 -0800 (PST), Sirius Kase



<SiriusK...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 4, 12:50 pm, lomnoir <lomn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 3, 10:09 pm, Sirius Kase <SiriusK...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 3, 9:57 pm, dicc...@xxxxxxxxx (Richard Eney) wrote:

Slytherin: locket
Ravenclaw: tiara
Hufflepuff: goblet
Gryffindor: Harry

=Tamar

Yes, someone finally spotted the Gryffindor horcrux. I thought of
that after I read your Subject, but before I read your post.

Then of course

Muggle Object: diary
Living Object: Nagini
Hallowed Object: Ring

Of course, Harry is also a Living Object, so maybe Nagini is an Animal
object, but that doesn't sound as cool.

True, Harry is also a living object. The thing is, Voldemort intended
to make six horcruxes out of the four house objects (yet failed to get
a Gryffindor artifact), the diary, and the ring. He wanted to split
his soul into seven pieces: six horcruxes plus the remnant of his soul
that he carried around with him. From what I know, he had five when he
hunted down the Potters: the ring, diadem, cup, locket, and diary.
Perhaps he intended to make the sixth with the death of the year-old
Harry, thereby making himself (in his mind) invincible: killing the
only one that would threaten his life and six pieces of his soul earth-
bound and forever hidden.

It makes sense that Voldy would want a Gryffindor horcrux, but he
certainly didn't intend for it to be Harry. I was hoping they'd find
an artifact at the old house in GH. Maybe he was looking for the
cloak? But, he didn't know about the DH or the 3 bros, so would he
have known about the cloak?

Well, the DE's eventually know Harry has one. Voldemort could have
known James had one. But then, it's not a Gryffendor relic. He'd
want something of Goderic's. Not any old Gryffendore house person's
item.

So, he wanted to kill Harry at GH. That means that the horcux object
was probably there, and left there, since V couldn't carry anything
away with him. Unless, Peter was there and carried away both his wand
and his intended horcux.


Maybe it was his wand. It would hold significant value. Phoenix
feather cores seem a rarity. That'd be worthy of a soul bit. And
it'd never really leave his sight. You want to destroy it, you have
to get it away from him, and good luck there, green lights flying at
you if you try.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: four houses, four horcruxes
    ... Hallowed Object: Ring ... his soul into seven pieces: six horcruxes plus the remnant of his soul ... Harry, thereby making himself invincible: ... Maybe it was his wand. ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: four houses, four horcruxes
    ... Hallowed Object: Ring ... Harry is also a living object. ... his soul into seven pieces: six horcruxes plus the remnant of his soul ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: four houses, four horcruxes
    ... Hallowed Object: Ring ... his soul into seven pieces: six horcruxes plus the remnant of his soul ... Harry, thereby making himself invincible: ... certainly didn't intend for it to be Harry. ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: Why I think Harry is not a Horcrux
    ... The biggest arguement against Harry being a Horcrux, ... Thus losing another piece of his soul to oblivion. ... most men and women expect more from each other than a ring and a blank diary with a hole in it can provide. ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: Harry probably is a Horcrux, yknow!
    ... >> Nice to know not everyone who doesn't think harry is a horcrux isn't as ... > I think it comes down to how the making of a Horcrux works. ... 'Killing rips the soul apart' - ... Whereas the soulbit in harry is ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)