Re: Quote: It's been called unhealthy, even sinister ... there is no question that Dumbledore took an unnatural interest in Potter.
- From: Toon <toon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:05:51 -0700
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:15:58 GMT, "DaveD"
<davedn1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just been rereading POA and GOF - in it Dd and Mad Eye can see Harry through
his invisibility cloak. But I thought the cloak being a deathly hallow was
impervious to spells, so surely that shouldn't have been possible with that
particular cloak, unlike any others?
DaveD
MAd Eye's Eye seems to be able to defy magic laws. Sees through DH
Cloaks, can see a boggart in it's natural form, etc.
I don't think DD sees through it as much as can just tell from other
evidence.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: JKRowling and Warner Bros sue HP Lexicon
- Next by Date: Re: "I'll never forgive Jo for ..."
- Previous by thread: Re: Quote: It's been called unhealthy, even sinister ... there is no question that Dumbledore took an unnatural interest in Potter.
- Next by thread: Re: Quote: It's been called unhealthy, even sinister ... there is no question that Dumbledore took an unnatural interest in Potter.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|