Re: Snape-related questions about Alan Rickman

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:50:20 +0100, "SickofInaccuracies"
<fakeemail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Sue H" <dahoov2@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dmobe31euti3bgr21tutugt6svn66q3d74@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:31:56 +0100, "SickofInaccuracies"
<fakeemail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Sue H" <dahoov2@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cunbe3hj941knn497u8uemscsa3agl1c88@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:00:57 +0100, "SickofInaccuracies"
<fakeemail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Sue H" <dahoov2@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lqlbe3lev02v4b1g9euejmr2luoqjktk57@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:38:56 +0100, "SickofInaccuracies"
<fakeemail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Sue H" <dahoov2@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1rhbe394p704i156t70qunqgchcft87pq8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:38:43 -0000, Fish Eye no Miko <fenm@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

Sue H <daho...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Fish Eye no Miko <f...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Sue H <daho...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Fish Eye no Miko <f...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Sue H <daho...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Actually, they did know more than us (DUH) but she
never gave away plot points.

And you know this how, exactly?

Uh, she said many times nobody knew the ending?
Sheesh.

Who said he knew the ending? Plot points /= "the ending".
She could have told Alan a lot of things about Snape without
telling him the ending.
Sheesh.

And I am not arguing she did.

Neither am I, yet you made it look like I was doing just that. Stop
misreading people's posts, then arguing against them based on your
own
misreading.

What I said from the very beginning was they didn't
know everything

No. This is what you said: "I don't think Alan Rickman new
anything;
none of them did."
That's very different from what you're arguing NOW, yet you're not
acknowledging that your argument has changed.

No it's not. The posted original link was to an article where
Rickman
supposedly said "he knew a little". I argued nobody knew what he
knew
and went on to say that the outcomes etc (big stuff) were not know
by the cast (and let me add crew and others in there). JK herself
she
did NOT tell anyone. And where it got off as me arguing against
that
I've no clue. I merely stated that where the cast didn't know all
about everything, they would need direction... and Jo had to give
them
something (even to the director who didn't know the outcomes of
their
pasts etc) to help aid in the directing. I don't know why I am
trying
to be made out a liar (especially since I freakin agreed with you).
I
don't even know why the hell I bother responding; it's a personal
issue with you. You like to attack me continually. you just seem to
want to "try and catch me" in something (personal I know for sure).
And to pick something ridiculously innocuous as this... it's
ridiculous. Because this subject is nothing! It affects nothing.

OK LET US ALL TRY THIS AGAIN IN NICE EASY READ CAPITALS FOR THE HARD
OF
UNDERSTANDING (SUE H THAT IS YOU) WHAT JK ROWLING ACTUALLY SAID WAS
THAT
SHE
HAD NOT TOLD ANYONE HOW THE BOOKS ENDED... NOW FOLLOW THIS I KNOW IT
IS
HARD
FOR A FREAKING MORON LIKE YOU BUT HERE WE GO AGAIN... THAT DOESN'T
MEAN
SHE
DID NOT REVEAL MAJOR PLOT POINTS TO THOSE SHE TOLD STUFF TO... GOT
THAT?
UNDERSTAND IT THIS TIME?

The only person here making you out to be a liar is you with your
freaking
moroninc posts and statements as well as all the evidence where you
take
others posts and twist them...

Do yourself a huge freaking favor and STFU because you are making
yourself
look dumber with every post!


I guess you never learned to read and if you didn't understand
something could not ask what the poster meant. Instead, you resort to
calling people liars and all sorts of mature things. Next thing you
know, you'll be saying "Your mama..."

I am not the one who has changed and twisted what I wrote and claimed
that
I
didn't write that... No that would be YOU... So before you accuse
others
of
not comprehending perhaps you had better go and actually read the ***
you
have posted and see how you have changed your story even calling others
liars when they have directly cut and posted what YOU wrote! So perhaps
you
need to go back and learn to read MORON!

Yeah; yeah, I get it; blah blah, I am a moron because you misread.
Whatever.

No you are a moron because you were wrong and you won't admit it and you
are
the one who twisted your posts rather than admit to what you posted
originally... Get a clue several different people do not just happen to
misread your posts, you can't get out of it that way. YOU WERE WRONG
MORON!
ADMIT IT OR STFU! Like I say go back and read the *** you have posted in
this thread and actually try to comprehend it, because then you will see
that you are the one in the wrong and that you have shown a total lack of
reading comprehension

It's not several people; it's a troll and Catherine. I've explained
enough. Away with you troll.

The only troll here is you. If you get off your fat ass and check you will
find I have been here for a lot longer than you and I am not a troll.. I
just get sick of idiots like you who come here and spout crap as though it
was given fact and then lie and twist about what they originally posted!
There was also at least one other person who told you that you were wrong...
but hey you are so STUPID you obviously glossed over that, not one person
here has supported you in your lies. So I suggest you get your head ourt of
your ass and go do your research so that in future you don't make yourself
look a total freaking moron! By the way like Catherine I was polite to you
till you started lying about what you had in fact posted!

1) I did not gloss over it; I answered every one of Catherine's posts
2) they don't want to get involved with a troll who name calls or in
the middle of an argument.
3) if you aren't a troll, you're the closest thing to one... you can't
control yourself and need anger management at the very least.
.

Loading