Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- From: Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen <bffpds@raxacoricofallapatoria>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:24:03 BST
Drusilla wrote:
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
Drusilla wrote:
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
The distinct possibility of a love potion is the sword hanging over
the head of most fans for those ships - since anyone who thinks that
book6 represents the status quo for the series doesn't understand
Rowling.
Having said that, I think the greater danger for Lupin/Tonks is simply
that she's not Nymphadora, impersonation being another hanging sword.
I KNEW IT!
Thanks.
About Tonks and Lupin, something was happening since OotP: She called
him Remus, IICR and no one else does except for Sirius.
Albus, Arthur, Bill, George, Kingsley, Minerva, Molly, and Peter also
call him Remus; so I'm afraid that proves nothing, Drusilla. ^_^
Except that Remus is more loved than he might think he is :)
Even by Peter?
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
--
Free Margaret Blaine now!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- From: drusilla
- Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- References:
- Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- From: Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
- Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- From: drusilla
- Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- Prev by Date: Re: Hagrid was wrong
- Next by Date: Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- Previous by thread: Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- Next by thread: Re: Strategic Value of Love Potions
- Index(es):