Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- From: Toon <toon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:38:22 -0400
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:48:54 -0500, drusilla <me@xxxxxx> wrote:
What about sending a Dementor to eliminate a problem child? is that
ethical? Dolores obviously would have used everything she was able to do
in order to prove Harry was wrong, but, as she didn't use the more
logical thing as a pensieve o Veritaserum might be because she could
have thought -or somehow knew - Harry was right and not lying.
I'm surprised she didn't try and Imperius him and make him admit he's
lying. Sure she'd fail, but she wouldn't know that.
.
- References:
- Proving Harry's innocence?
- From: handofomega
- Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- From: Here in Minnesota
- Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- From: handofomega
- Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- From: Here in Minnesota
- Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- From: drusilla
- Proving Harry's innocence?
- Prev by Date: Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- Next by Date: Re: Another thought on the 'Harry will die in book seven' theoy.
- Previous by thread: Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- Next by thread: Re: Proving Harry's innocence?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|