Re: Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- From: "Fish Eye no Miko" <fisheye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:23:30 -0700
Andy wrote:
> Seriously, you seem so angry and offended. Clearly you've made
> your point.
Really? Them why don't you acknowledge the errors I've pointed out?
Obviously I haven't made my point.
> You think I'm just making up a bunch of nonsense out of thin
> air that has nothing to do with the books.
Right. And you have yet to prove me wrong. Quotes? Anything?
> That's fine. That being the case, I don't see why you don't just
> dismiss me as not worth the effort and move on,
Because, frankly, I'd like to see you acknowledge your mistakes, which you
seem loathe to do.
> I certainly feel no need to respond to a barrage of sarcasm and the
> discussion group equivalent of yelling (all-caps), and I feel that
> continued such rudeness would have to be brought to the attention of
> this group's moderator.
Uh.. There is no "moderator". This is an open discussion group, where
everyone's free to say what they want.
How long have you been on Usenet, anyway?
Oh, and yes, I do get rude when I point things out and the person I'm
replying to ignores them.
> My line of inquiry, even if you happen to think I'm way out in left
> field, is in keeping with the goals of this group: "An arena for
> discussing theories, predictions, interesting discoveries, and ideas
> about the Harry Potter septology."
Yes, but theories and predictions need facts to back them up. You have yet
to point out any facts from the book to support your theory. ANY. At all.
> I hope that others out there might still be interested in discussing
> the postulation that it is the destiny of Harry and Voldy to forge
> the next phoenix.
Frankly, I don't think you're going to get a lot of positive replies. Your
errors, your refusal to use canon to try to back up your theory, and your
dismissal of anyone who disagrees with you all add up to very bad debating
techniques.
Catherine Johnson.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- From: Andy
- Re: Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- From: Fish Eye no Miko
- Re: Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- From: Andy
- Re: Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- From: Fish Eye no Miko
- Re: Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- From: Andy
- Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- Prev by Date: Re: FAO Drusilla
- Next by Date: Re: Heavy LOCKET at number twelve, Grimmaul Place
- Previous by thread: Re: Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- Next by thread: Re: Here's a condensed and refined version of my theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|