Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- From: Toon <toon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 04:13:20 -0500
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:29:45 GMT, DM <dm498@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>sTuFf wrote:
>
>> A horcrux if i remember correctly is made when a wizard after killing
>> someone splits his soul and magically places one part of his soul in a
>> person or object, yes?
>>
>> Why then would Voldemort kill Lily, and then attempt to kill Harry ?
>>
>> It doesn't make sense. Why would he turn Harry into a horcrux when he was
>> trying to kill him with Adavra Kadavara (sp?).
>>
>> Voldemort is obviously scared by the prophecy and is trying to eliminate the
>> threat at its source before it becomes more powerful.
>>
>>
>
>You are also forgetting the most obvious reason Harry cannot be a
>horcrux - the prophecy cannot be fulfilled if Harry must destroy himself
>in order to defeat Voldemort.
Yes it can. It's not binding. and the hand of the other is V putting
his soul bit in Harry's scar. Nowhere is there a time limit for the
hard of the other.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- From: Thom Madura
- Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- From: Randy
- Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- From: DM
- Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- References:
- Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- From: DM
- Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- Prev by Date: Re: This may be a stupid queston
- Next by Date: Re: What would be the one thing you wish was in the movie (Goblet of Fire) that was omitted?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- Next by thread: Re: Why Harry *isn't* a Horcrux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|