Re: The release of Beaky
- From: "Aaron" <aaronsan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Oct 2005 05:17:42 -0700
Toon wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2005 05:40:50 -0700, "Aaron" <aaronsan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> And you've time traveled how many times?
> >
> >I have a major in physics from MIT, you nitwit. Now move on.
> >
> >-Aaron
>
> You have a major in physics from MIT, and you have to call me a
> nitwit? Wow, that intelligence wore off fast, huh? Once again, and
> you know you're theories are right how? Theories are all well and
> good, and quite logical, but by no means right.
*snip random unrelated ramblings*
Toon, my response was due to your arrogant question that implied that,
somehow, you have some alternate time-travel theory that goes against
current scientific theory. If so, you may be the next Einstein, but
judging from your posts, you are far from it. There is no better theory
right now, so there is no point continuing to say "wrong" or "and you
have time traveled how many times?" in response, over and over again.
If you weren't so derogatory in every post, perhaps my reply would have
been different, but you insult everyone on this newsgroup regularly.
>
> You'll forgive me if I'm not assured by your inflated sense of self
> importance.
You recognize that in me with a certain familiarity of the subject,
which was quite predictable. It's not inflated importance I have, but
confidence in my *knowledge* of physics. You, on the other hand...yes,
I would call that inflated self-importance (it needs to be hyphenated,
by the way).
> Scientific theories change way to much, especially when
> dealing with the unknown This is why people try and attack evolution
> with Intelligent Design of all things. Like evolution's not a fact.
> Sure, attack one of the thing scientists have proven.
>
If I liked you, I would laugh, because this is one of my pet peeves,
and I have many amusing anecdotes about the idiots who don't accept
evolution as fact.
> I'd move on, but I'm too much of a nitwit to do so. And we know I am,
> because the guy with the major in physics from MITsays so,
We know you are, because of each and every post you make, aside from
perhaps this one. I'm marginally impressed by this one, and you may
only *post* like a nitwit, most of the time. There. I modify my
assessment of you to that.
> Gee, if you're what being smart's like, I'm glad I'm
> a "nitwit".
Not very smart of you to admit that you aren't smart. Well, I guess
that's circular reasoning, isn't it?
> Nitwit. The dude's got a major in physics from MIT, and the best he
> can come up with is nitwit. Majors in physics from MIT sure aren't
> what they used to be anymore.
LOL! Like you would know what they are like. And yes, I admit my
English is only par for a science major from a school whose liberal
arts courses are jokes. You didn't anticipate this?
-Aaron
.
- References:
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Dwayne
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Don Simard
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Fish Eye no Miko
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Aaron
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Toon
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Toon
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Aaron
- Re: The release of Beaky
- From: Toon
- Re: The release of Beaky
- Prev by Date: Re: The release of Beaky
- Next by Date: Re: The release of Beaky
- Previous by thread: Re: The release of Beaky
- Next by thread: Re: The release of Beaky
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
