Re: Snape-Lovers. Possible help from an unlikely source.


"BubblyBabs" <bubblybabs_at_fractalfairy_dot_com@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Vqa%e.9610$7l.6869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <SNIP>
>> Read my earlier post - There was no real Locket in that Cave.
>> The locket was just decoy, a red herring and there was no RAB
>> involved. Voldemort hid the locket with note in the potion so that if
>> 2 wizards found it and
>> not 1 - the unaffected wizard who hadnt drunk the potion would think
>> the Horcrux had already
>> been removed. He wouldn't suspect his friend had drunk a Horcrux. His
>> friend would lapse into
>> a coma from which he would eventually awake but by then he would be
>> completely possessed by Voldemort.
>
> OK, fine, let's say the liquid was the horcrux... Then that means that
> whomever RAB is (or his accomplice) already drank the horcrux and it's
> gone... DD could not have drunk it because RAB (or his accomplice)
> already
> did...
>
> Why would RAB put a necklace into the potion to tell V that he already got
> the horcrux if V would have to remove his horcrux in order to get to it?
> V
> would know if his horcrux was in that liquid when he went to investigate
> it...
>
> Babs

re-read my posts in this thread - Ive been fairly clear that I think the
whole locket with a note thing was a decoy to fool whoever drank the potion
(or whoever was with them) into thinking the locket was the Horcrux and it
had already been taken. That way they wouldnt suspect the potion was really
the Horcrux and that would give it time to take effect ie take control of
whoever drank it. Remember the Diary? It took time to take possession of
Ginny Weasley and so would the potion. So there was RAB - no one but
Voldemort used that cave before Dumbledore and Harry turned up.


.