Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- From: Philip Lewis <flip+spiced_ham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jul 2005 16:02:49 -0400
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen <bffpds@raxacoricofallapatoria> writes:
>Faron wrote:
>> The counter-spell when Quirrel tried to make Harry fall off his broom?
>Err, I'm not quite sure about this - there was no counter spell, Hermione
>accidentally bumped into him. Or do you mean counter-broomstick spell?
They saw snape mumbling, but made no mention of him actively waving
his wand. (that i recall)
This does not preclude him holding his wand, but at his side.
One has to also wonder about some of the other "wandless" magics,
however. Could some of them be cast with a wand, only to be triggered
later on? Take the mauraders map for example. (I don't recall offhand
if a wand is needed for that... but i thought it was just "swearing"
and "managing")
--
be safe.
flip
Ich habe keine Ahnung was das bedeutet, oder vielleicht doch?
Remove origin of the word spam from address to reply (leave "+")
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- From: Faron
- Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- References:
- Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- From: Faron
- Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- From: Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
- Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- Prev by Date: Re: Unbreakable Vow?
- Next by Date: Re: If the Americans had got their way with JKR....
- Previous by thread: Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- Next by thread: Re: what's the obsession with wandless magic?
- Index(es):