Re: Serial ATA: SCSI Replacement?
- From: "Jeff" <Jeff_G_invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:25:01 GMT
"Robert Hancock" <hancockr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:wpKNg.532589$Mn5.4116@xxxxxxxxxxx
PeteCresswell wrote:
Given that SCSI is then and Serial ATA is now; does Serial ATA fulfill
that function?
Well, yes, but that is nothing special. The replacement for SCSI is
actually going to be SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) which is a superset of
SATA and supports some additional features.
As of now, SAS deserves to be completely ignored,
considering what little benefit they offer in almost all cases
and what manufacturers are charging for SAS hardware.
Controllers run $600-up and drives are similarly overpriced.
.
- References:
- Serial ATA: SCSI Replacement?
- From: PeteCresswell
- Re: Serial ATA: SCSI Replacement?
- From: Robert Han***
- Serial ATA: SCSI Replacement?
- Prev by Date: Re: SATA 3.0 Issue with P4PE Raid Controller
- Next by Date: A7 notebook questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Serial ATA: SCSI Replacement?
- Next by thread: Re: Serial ATA: SCSI Replacement?
- Index(es):