Re: Paul and Old Man: Cannot fix RAID5 failure ...

In article <e2fp9t$glv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "John7" <NoSp@xxxxxx> wrote:

Data recovery
==========
Now I need to concentrate on raid array or data recovery (if still
possible).
I removed the drive reported in error, no boot or rebuild.
Then re-inserted this drive, still no boot or rebuild.
Can I force the Intel Matrix Storage ROM (or Windows Storage Manager
utility) to rebuild?

I tried Universal Boot Disc (UBCD) but it won't load the RAID driver finaly
(used F6 key).
I was considering a parallel WinXP installation on a 4th disk, install Intel
RAID driver and
run Create RAID From Existing Hard Drive in Intel's Matrix storage Console.
If this fails, I can always consider Runtimes' RAIDreconstructor.


Any thoughts?


TIA,
John7

In my first post, I stated my first priority would be copying the
remaining good disks, to identical sized disks. If you need the
services of professional data recovery, you will want the
original disks in pristine condition, so they can be recovered.

In terms of the process I would go through, I like your idea of
installing the OS on a separate standalone disk drive, boot
and install Intel RAID drivers, then reconnect whatever disks
you want to attempt recovery with. Maybe whatever code Intel has
for Windows (Matrix Storage Manager) will do a better job than
the BIOS RAID module.

In Googling

raid "parity calculation"

I was surprised to find several claims, that a three disk RAID5
with one missing member would not boot (not for a P5LD2,
just RAID5 in general). It is supposed to! Based on those
reports, I think from now on, when someone suggests RAID5,
I'll suggest trying with four drives and not three. So far
I haven't found an explanation for why this would be.

When you are finished this exercise, I would configure the
machine permanently, to using a separate disk for the boot
disk. Certainly, you should be able to convince your
customer, that putting everything on that RAID5 is not
the right answer. If the boot disk is just used for booting,
and doesn't contain gobs of newly added stuff, you might
even prep a replacement boot drive for the day that it
fails :-)

Paul
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Boot Problem
    ... Was either disk set up as a Microsoft dynamic disk? ... Do not change the boot sector signature. ... I ensure all OK by swapping over drives. ... installing XP as it insisted there was no drive to install itself on! ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: 2 drives needed to boot - how to fix
    ... my cloned drive and my system won't boot. ... seems my system wants both hard drives to be able to boot. ... Which is your primary master disk - the old or the new disk? ... Could you, in effect, start over by making a fresh install of the XP OS ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: NTLDR is missing
    ... Make sure that there are no disks in any removable drives when you boot. ... NTLDR is missing, why does it happen? ... Computer hard disk drive is not properly setup in BIOS. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: [SLE] Problems with initrd after mkinitrd
    ... A disk can have three real heads and report a dozen or a hundred! ... > natural metric for partitioning drives that use LBA. ... > - One, less frequent, is the failure of some of the cloned drives to boot ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Grub hangs - two hard drives and a CD
    ... > What you wrote is all based on a wrong assumption that grub numbers drives ... > that the BIOS will call to boot an OS. ... The Bios calls to read disk require the register DL to ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)