Re: FX-55 vs. X2 4800+
- From: Phil DeBecker <in_a_coma_dial_999@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:28:36 GMT
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:17:50 -0800, "formerprof" <formerprof@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>I am running with an FX-55 CPU on the ASUS A8n-SLI Deluxe board. My CPU is
>always at full load because SETI is running 24/7. Could I expect any
>noticeable performance gains from the 4800+ X2? Presumably the SETI
>calculations would be primarily confined to one of the two cores.
>
>My memory is running at DDR 400, 2T. I've read somewhere that the newer X2
>Athlon 64s have improved memory bus performance. Is there a chance that my
>chips will run at 1T with the newer CPU? I have 2x1gb 3,3,3,8 DIMMs.
>
>All help will be most gratefully received. Good wishes to all.
>
>formerprof
>
An X2 CPU would undoubtedly give you a huge increase in performance,
since as you say one core would run SETI while the other would be free
to run whatever else you are doing.
As far as the 1T/2T, I would not expect the CPU to change that, since
the command rate is determined by the motherboard, not the CPU. In
any case you would see no measurable difference in overall performance
even if you did change the command rate to 1T.
The 4800+ X2 is a good upgrade; it will run single-threaded
applications about as fast as your FX-55, and since it is fabricated
with a 90nm process instead of the 130mm process of the FX-55 and runs
at 2400mhz instead of 2600 mhz, it will run much cooler.
Phil
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FX-55 vs. X2 4800+
- From: Mark A
- Re: FX-55 vs. X2 4800+
- References:
- FX-55 vs. X2 4800+
- From: formerprof
- FX-55 vs. X2 4800+
- Prev by Date: Re: Marvell Yukon Gigabit Ethernet Controller new drivers 8.39.3.3 may solve lockup problem
- Next by Date: Re: System Failure - CPU Task
- Previous by thread: FX-55 vs. X2 4800+
- Next by thread: Re: FX-55 vs. X2 4800+
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|