Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: "Paul Busby" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:22:56 +0100
Thus spake DDC:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:21:19 +0100, "Paul Busby" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> The 7000B Cu is very heavy indeed - just as well it is firmly bolted
>> to the m/b. I did consider the CuAl version but on paper, its
>> thermal properties didn't look much better than my 6000Cu. I would
>> prefer the heavier unit with 4 bolt mounting than the lighter one
>> clipped on with its consequent leverage on the socket.
>
>> The 6000Cu had a 120mm Dustproof Acousti fan running off 12V @
>> 1500rpm where my new 7000 is running on its lowest setting with a
>> CPU running at a fair level of overclocking - albeit a mobile
>> version at 1350rpm (XP-M2500+ @ 2303MHz = 200x11.5/1.725V). My 80mm
>> exhaust fan is also running of ~5V @ 1350rpm. The CPU can run with
>> total stability for hours at 100% load using burnk7 which stresses
>> the CPU far more than Prime95 does. It does knock down the 5V supply
>> to reported low of 4.73V but survives without issue. If I'm willing
>> to up the Vcore to max my m/b will allow & run both fans at medium
>> speed, I can run this CPU @12x200, again with stability & headroom
>> to spare during warm weather but choose the quieter option.
>
>
>> If I was goofy enough to do Lan parties I may have 2nd thoughts
>> about the 7000Cu's excessive weight but my PC gets fettled then left
>> alone for months. I forgot I had my very well insulated
>> (soundproofed) Lian Li PC60 case's front stock fans set to medium
>> speed so reset them back to low before testing & lowering the Vcore
>> to its current value. The 7000Cu never let me run @ 2400MHz or
>> 2300MHz @ less than 1.750V or with so little sound that my 2 Hitachi
>> SATA discs are the main source of noise. The m/b is well able to
>> cope with the more than recommended weight & feels very solid. The
>> extra cooling & reduced noise exceeded my expectations. Apart from
>> having to remove the m/b from the tray it was much easier to fit
>> than the 6000 was. The XP-M2500+ was a real bargain as well!
>
>
> You know it's pretty much complicated to chose a fan. lol, first of
> all we must check the thermal dissipation factor, but the al and
> copper are very close... So i've done some research in my books for
> the thermal resistance of the copper and the aluminum. Well what i say
> is that copper is the most efficient for heat dissipation vs aluminum
> witch as the half of it's ability. But considering that Al has the 1/3
> of the mass of the copper it seem to regain some points. In a other
> hands the ,Al, has the ability to retain the heat much longer so a
> good fan should be use "that's the reason it's more noisy". By that
> both fans are mostly identical. one will be more noisy " the aluminum
> one" and the other not. 27db for the full speed is again more queit
> than most HDD.
>
> that link here shows at the page 7 the curve desing of the fans.
> http://www.zalman.co.kr/Upload/product/CNPS7000B_eng.PDF
> One thing would have been fun to be shown in the diagram. The
> operating point of temperature "40*C, 50*C" witch one goes whit the
> diagram? It's missing so by this we can't figure out or well it will
> operate.
>
> An other point is coming, the more resistivity you have in thermal
> exchange the less transfer you have. it like what you've got in your
> wall, the insulation, the bigger the number for the resistance the
> better it reduce the exchange in heat. So ie : for the heating period
> in the winter we've got less transfer. So here it's the same
> situation. people got confused by the weight and it's thermal
> resistivity. but the desing in the copper kind show that it doesn't do
> much better than the al one.
>
> The real factor that rule my choice is this.
> 0.29 ~ 0.22 ¡ÆC/W for the CNPS7000A-AlCu LED
> 0.27 ~ 0.20 ¡ÆC/W for the CNPS7000B-Cu LED
> So the .02W/*C is very small in gain when choose a heavy weight from
> an other when you have mostly the same thing at the alf of it's
> weight.
>
> i steal stick with the al even if the copper the "kind of steel or
> metal" is better. Also i'm sure that this fan was desing on paper with
> the aluminum and for extra marketing, they've build one with copper
> just to brag around...
>
> DDC
My aim was max noise reduction. My original thoughts were tempered by the
thermal resistance of my 6000Cu not being that much higher but I guess that
the 7000 is just a much better design that has far better airflow through
the fins & better fan positioning. I wonder how much a silver version would
cost, though its contact area would need plating?! The new 9500 won't fit
socket A but ain't that heavy with a thermal r of 0.12-0.16C/w that probably
betters lower-end water cooling.
--
Thank people in advance? Thanking or cursing them afterwards at least
gives some feedback!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: DDC
- Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: Paul
- Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: Travis King
- Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: DDC
- Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: Paul Busby
- Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: DDC
- Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: Paul Busby
- Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- From: DDC
- a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- Prev by Date: Re: One Beep- But No Video!
- Next by Date: Re: Upgarde the cpu on a A7V333
- Previous by thread: Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- Next by thread: Re: a7n8x-x last upgrade. wich cpu is as the most for the price?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading