Re: Which is the best graphics card for use with scientific software as Mathematica?
- From: "SC Tom" <sc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:15:50 -0500
"Eroes" <EroesTogliquesto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4ohdh75aoeg7ib1mcp8oqsioaa426p6cnl@xxxxxxxxxx
Which is the best graphics card for use with scientific software as
Mathematica?
Is better a Nvidia Quadro 600 or a Nvidia GTX 560?
The friends of university tell me that is better Quadro 600 for some
specific drivers.
In a shop of computer science have recommended me instead the GTX 560
because it has more Cuda core
Can you help me ?
Thanks
Back in my working life, we used Quadro cards on our CAD stations. I was very satisfied with the performance and reliability. I'm not familiar with Mathematica, but the 600 is an entry level card. You can get some info here http://www.nvidia.com/object/workstation-solutions.html on the Quadro, and here http://www.geforce.com/Hardware/GPUs/geforce-gtx-560 for the GTX 560.
--
SC Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Which is the best graphics card for use with scientific software as Mathematica?
- Next by Date: Re: Which is the best graphics card for use with scientific software as Mathematica?
- Previous by thread: Which is the best graphics card for use with scientific software as Mathematica?
- Next by thread: Re: Which is the best graphics card for use with scientific software as Mathematica?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
