Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- From: "DaSilvor" <dasilvor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:06:05 +0100
"Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)" <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:487ee1f9@xxxxxxxxxxxx
The reason I use ATI is I go for price/performance to a certain degree
rather than pure performance. I would not use ATI just to use it.
I bought a 4850... :P
I'm thinking about it. The 4850 certainly leaves the 3870 way behind in
performance, and is not that much more expensive.
Plus a review I've seen indicate the 48xx series Crossfire performance is
much improved over earlier cards as well.
DaSilvor
---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to 100,000+ newsgroups
.
- References:
- nVidia vs. ATI
- From: Matt
- Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- From: geoff
- Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)
- Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- From: geoff
- Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)
- nVidia vs. ATI
- Prev by Date: Re: WD Raptor or WD Caviar in RAID setup?
- Next by Date: Re: WD Raptor or WD Caviar in RAID setup?
- Previous by thread: Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- Next by thread: Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|