Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- From: "Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)" <toylet.toylet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:44:16 +0800
Matt wrote:
Hey guys. Since I'm getting a mtoherboard based on the X48 chipset, if
I wanted to use two graphics cards in parallel, I have to go with ATI.
This isn't ideal :(
Therefore for my new build, is their an ATI card with similar
performance to the nVidia 8800GT (as this seems to be about the right
price) that I could get now?
Intel's latest chipsets have built-in CrossFire, ie, ATI standard. But NVidia seem to be in the leading edge....
The benefit would be that as soon as this ATI card starts to fall
behind, I can stick a second identical card in and get better
performance.
4850 (and 4870) are really bargain deals.... Do you really need to use 2 VGA cards? You need good ventilation to keep the whole system cool. Also, a big fan means the loss of a PCI/PCIe slot per VGA card.
--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04) Linux 2.6.26
^ ^ 10:40:01 up 2 days 14:06 2 users load average: 1.24 1.11 1.04
? ? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa/
.
- References:
- nVidia vs. ATI
- From: Matt
- nVidia vs. ATI
- Prev by Date: Re: [ot]
- Next by Date: Re: XP Authentication after June 30?
- Previous by thread: nVidia vs. ATI
- Next by thread: Re: nVidia vs. ATI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|