Re: PC2100 PC2700 Memory compatibility

mrique wrote:
thks a lot for your feed back, other than the trolled RTFM
http://www.crucial.com is also a good shot

sorry for those who dislike GG ;-(, and you know what : I also use
windows and don't know linux !


We offer a "value added" service here. If you tell us
more about the computer you are upgrading, we provide
warnings as appropriate. The Crucial site doesn't
tell you everything.

For example, if the device is a server, then it could
use "registered" versus "unbuffered" memory. You have
to buy the right type for it to fit in a server socket.

Paul
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable
    ... > In X Windows, it looks like the way to do it is to grab the keyboard ... > and mouse pointer, disable synthetic events, and read keystroke events. ... access to the X server socket, ... the X protocol has a hole like the Windows one we're discussing, ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Privilege-escalation attacks on NT-based Windows are unfixable
    ... > In X Windows, it looks like the way to do it is to grab the keyboard ... > and mouse pointer, disable synthetic events, and read keystroke events. ... access to the X server socket, ... the X protocol has a hole like the Windows one we're discussing, ...
    (comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security)
  • Re: Block reading from socket and STDIN
    ... I am on a Windows XP PC and I am using ruby186-26. ... I am writing a client/Multiplexing Server socket application, ... beside to listening on the socket via the ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)