Re: AMD 3000+ Correct Config?

"Mista Fadedglory" <mistafadedglory@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149030735.615815.106030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
OK, that's great information. Wanted to make sure that I didn't waste
my money. So, if this is the case, then I could have sworn when I had
an AMD 2700+ (only 32 bit) that it was running at 2.1 or 2.2 gHz. Did
I degrade?

Or are you saying that the AMD at 1.8 compares to the Intel at 3.0?

Yes

What would the clockspeed of a AMD 64 4000+ run at?

It's on that AMD page I linked to in my last post.

Sorry for so many questions :)

NP
SteveH


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Pomes
    ... alternative too cumbersome for speech. ... (Amd I remember Patric Stewart ... once saying in an interview that he had to practice a loooooooong time ...
    (uk.rec.sheds)
  • Re: AMD 3000+ Correct Config?
    ... Wanted to make sure that I didn't waste ... my money. ... So, if this is the case, then I could have sworn when I had ... Or are you saying that the AMD at 1.8 compares to the Intel at 3.0? ...
    (alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
  • Re: MLOC with style
    ... sounding much ... like they were saying: ... > I have never claimed that amd never will. ... Devaluing my arguments is no ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Can HLA and X get along?
    ... your response to someone saying "RosAsm doesn't work"? ... they do not offer an AMD with Ubuntu. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: AMD 3000+ Correct Config?
    ... my money. ... So, if this is the case, then I could have sworn when I had ... Or are you saying that the AMD at 1.8 compares to the Intel at 3.0? ...
    (alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)