How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- From: "Dave (from the UK)" <see-my-signature@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:00:55 +0000
I get the feeling PCI graphics cards are going to be a lot slower than AGP ones. But how bad are they? I've no interest in 3D games, but are they very responsive for 2D tasks?
I've got a dual Xeon motherboard with a graphics card with only 8 MB on board. There is no AGP slot. So that only leaves putting a PCI card in for somewhat better graphics.
Ideally I'd like 24 bit, (but 16 bit would do I guess) at 1600x1200 at 60 Hz to drive my TFT.
One option is to sell the dual Xeon motherboard and buy another, but that is going to be more expensive.
--
Dave K MCSE.
MCSE = Minefield Consultant and Solitaire Expert.
Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form: month-year@domain. Hitting reply will work
for a couple of months only. Later set it manually.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- From: John Weiss
- Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- From: Charlie Wilkes
- Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- From: Charlie Wilkes
- Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- From: larry moe 'n curly
- Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- From: Bob Knowlden
- Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- From: JAD
- Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- Prev by Date: Re: Setting up SATA HD and CD ROM - How to connect ide cable for CD-ROM
- Next by Date: Re: How to use AGP graphic card and on-board graphics atthes
- Previous by thread: Hmm. 64 bit chipset drivers ?
- Next by thread: Re: How bad are PCI graphics cards?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|