Re: x2 are (C) 2001?

From: David Maynard <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:11:40 -0500

Ed Medlin wrote:

"EdwardH" <edwardh@N:O:S:P:A:M:edward.dyndns.org> wrote in message news:57w5f.148642$dP1.506493@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When I bought my x2 3800 I saw the text "(C) 2001".
Are AMD trying to tell me they've been sitting on dualcore technology for four years and only now are they releasing it to the public?
It was in development then and they got a copywrite for the technology.
Ed


copyright

Follow-Ups:
- Re: x2 are (C) 2001?
  - From: Hackworth

References:
- x2 are (C) 2001?
  - From: EdwardH
- Re: x2 are (C) 2001?
  - From: Ed Medlin

Prev by Date: Re: Hardware mystery . . . USB 2.0 on a USB 1.1 chip???
Next by Date: tower is loading but not showing on screen
Previous by thread: Re: x2 are (C) 2001?
Next by thread: Re: x2 are (C) 2001?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

x2 are (C) 2001?
... Are AMD trying to tell me they've been sitting on dualcore technology for four years and only now are they releasing it to the public? ...
(alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
Re: x2 are (C) 2001?
... > Are AMD trying to tell me they've been sitting on dualcore technology for ... > four years and only now are they releasing it to the public? ...
(alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
Re: x2 are (C) 2001?
... >>>Are AMD trying to tell me they've been sitting on dualcore technology for ... that you were guilty of a copyrite violation. ...
(alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
Re: [SLE] the 64 bit plunge
... > I finally took the plunge and bought a 64 bit AMD and main board. ... > are sitting in the boxes, waiting for the weekend. ...
(SuSE)
TRU64 /usr/sbin/quot overflow
... in light of the non-exec stack talks I am releasing some info ... I have been sitting on... ... alpha.snosoft.com> uname -a ... quot: root_domain#root: Permission denied ...
(Vuln-Dev)