Re: How does an 800Mhz celeron compare to lower speed Pentium II etc ?
- From: David Maynard <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 05:19:46 -0500
Ian Roberts wrote:
"Ian Roberts" <sorry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:df2hdo$rfo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi
I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask but didnt know where else to try...
Just wanted to find out where an 800Mhz Celeron would be placed in a hirearchical chart compared to early Pentiums, Pentium II etc etc.
I'm not entirely clear what distinguished the Celerons from Pentiums (no on chip cache?).
But once the speed of the celerons rocketed, I got confused as to which would be a faster processor in everyday use - how do they rank when compared to a lower speed Pentium II, III?
Thanks for any info
Ian
Ahh - just in case anyone else is interested I found one here:
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20041221/cpu_charts-10.html#overview_of_all_intel_cpus
Cheers
Sorry I missed the original post but to answer your question, the celeron 800 is significantly faster than anything in the P-II line, which you know from the chart you've found.
As for the difference, the desktop P-II has 512K of 'slot' cache (the entire reason for the slot cartridge to begin with) running at half the speed of the processor whereas the celeron has 128K of on-die cache running at the full speed of the processor (post 300, 300A first with cache). They're the same core.
The full speed cache compensates for the smaller amount and the first 'magic' overclocker was the Celeron 300A/66Mhz FSB which would easily do 450 overclocked to the standard 100MHz FSB and bench equal to the 'top of the line' P-II 450. A stock celeron 466, however, is not quite as fast due to the lower 66MHz FSB starving the full speed cache.
Your 800, however, is already running 100MHz FSB so it would compare well with an equivalent P-II if such a thing as an 800MHz P-II existed.
The celeron looses it's 'equivalency' with the coppermine P-IIIs as they use twice as much, 256K, of the same on-die full speed cache and are about 20%, or so, faster clock for clock.
.
- References:
- How does an 800Mhz celeron compare to lower speed Pentium II etc ?
- From: Ian Roberts
- Re: How does an 800Mhz celeron compare to lower speed Pentium II etc ?
- From: Ian Roberts
- How does an 800Mhz celeron compare to lower speed Pentium II etc ?
- Prev by Date: Re: How does an 800Mhz celeron compare to lower speed Pentium II etc ?
- Next by Date: Re: How: install XP on top of itself?
- Previous by thread: Re: How does an 800Mhz celeron compare to lower speed Pentium II etc ?
- Next by thread: Good Micro ATX case?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|