Re: MBAM IP-BLOCK
- From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:43:56 -0500
From: "Jim Nugent" <njim2k-etsnews@xxxxxxxxx>
| David W. Hodgins wrote:
|On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:02:08 -0500, Dustin
Dennis <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
*sigh*. Probably should report that to them. teamviewer shouldnt be
blocked by default...
Report to MBAM?
Depends on who installed teamviewer. If it's been intentionally
installed by the owner of the system, then it can be ignored. If
not, then the owner does need to be made aware that it has been
installed. In my opinion, it's a potentially un-wanted program.
Regards, Dave Hodgins
| I use TeamViewer on my home lan under free "personal use" license. I don't
| believe there's a way to connect remotely to a computer that runs it without
| alerting the user and giving them the option to kick the "intruder" off.
| It's a help desk product, not a security product.
| I will say that I haven't studied every way to configure it, or every way it
| can be hacked, but I am surprised that it is flagged as a PUP unless no one
| at MBAM knows much about it and their attitude is "Let the user make an
Sometime a signature meant for one piece of malware is found in something legitimate.
There is a sub-forum at Malwarebytes specifically for submitting possible False Positive declarations.
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
- Prev by Date: Re: I vote for Justin!
- Next by Date: Re: I vote for Justin!
- Previous by thread: Re: MBAM IP-BLOCK
- Next by thread: Re: MBAM IP-BLOCK