Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- From: Terry Pinnell <terrypin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:50:38 +0000
Nil <rednoise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08 Jan 2011, Wolf K <wekirch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
alt.comp.anti-virus:
I kept Malwarebytes, and discarded the others. Avira kept popping
up an advert for the paid version, and I didn't need SAS (I have
Spybot Search and Destroy). But if you have no other anti-spyware
program, SAS is as good a choice as any.
They are not all equivalent programs. Avira is a resident anti-virus
program. The others are on-demand spyware detectors. Unless you are not
telling us the whole story, it appears you have no anti-virus
protection. Risky.
Spybot S&D, Malwarebytes, and Superantispyware are all in the same
category of spyware detectors. Spybot has declined in recent years -
either of the other two are better choices.
I don't follow. As I understand it, MWB also has a resident, real time
protection function?
--
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- From: FromTheRafters
- Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- References:
- Opinions of these 3 programs?
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- From: Wolf K
- Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- From: Nil
- Opinions of these 3 programs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- Next by Date: Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions of these 3 programs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|