Re: Trojan bifrose removal?

Leythos wrote:

Why don't you stop flapping your gums and give a detailed rebuttal
to each of my points?

Because it would do no good, you've shown that you're only
interested in nitpicking

Nitpicking?

We're talking about the fundamental differences between FAT32 and NTFS
which (you say) point to NTFS being far superior to FAT32, and now you
label a discussion about those details as nitpicking?

and that nothing will change your position.

A coherent (and DEFENDABLE) explanation as to why NTFS is superior to
FAT32 _will_ change my position.

My personal as well as professional experience gives me enough
data to believe you are completely wrong

Why don't you explain how I'm wrong? Why don't you have the guts, or
the knowledge, to explain how or where I'm wrong?

I've posted specific, detailed answers. It should be easy to point out
how they're wrong.

If you don't, then all we're left with is just more gum-flapping from
you.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Formating Large (200+GB) FAT32 Volumes Appears to Generate Errors
    ... This is because NTFS is the superior ... and not nearly as wasteful of drive space. ... TB was formatted as FAT32. ... doesn't mean that his contention regarding the superiority of NTFS ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Trojan bifrose removal?
    ... We're talking about the fundamental differences between FAT32 and NTFS ... label a discussion about those details as nitpicking? ... Becuase NTFS doesn't leave CHK files around on disks. ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • Re: Is it true about NTFS
    ... > FAT32 because they need to be compatible with earlier versions of Windows ... >> There are two ways to go back to FAT32 from NTFS: ... >> However, NTFS is superior to FAT32 in several important aspects, not the ... >>> first article or the second? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Is it true about NTFS
    ... While some say NTFS is superior for reasons mentioned others want to use ... FAT32 because they need to be compatible with earlier versions of Windows ... >> first article or the second? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Is it true about NTFS
    ... There are two ways to go back to FAT32 from NTFS: ... However, NTFS is superior to FAT32 in several important aspects, not the ... > first article or the second? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)