Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- From: Art <null@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:48:57 GMT
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:08:55 -0500, Virus Guy <Virus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Art wrote:
Malwares are programs. Programs are written for different
platforms. Windows programs cannot be run under any version
of DOS. OTOH, many DOS programs run under Windows, and not
just Win 9X.
Just because a given piece of malware can be executed in a 16-bit DOS
shell (or in pure DOS mode) does that necessarily make it DOS
malware?
Of course not. Many command line programs are Windows programs which
cannot be run in "pure" DOS.
What if it's intent is to affect some aspect of the
overlying Windows OS? Is it still appropriate to catagorize it as DOS
malware?
I offer a 16 bit non-malicious program which can only do its thing
when run in a command line Window of Windows. (Updater using
the Windows version of WGET). That doesn't make my program a Windows
program. Similarly, a DOS program which purposely causes damage when
run in a command line Window is still a DOS program and thus DOS
malware, IMO.
DOS viruses/malware 231.088
Windows viruses 20.546
Macro viruses 37.181
Script viruses/malware 7.449
Worms 23.398
Backdoors 78.092
Trojans 69.008
other malware 5.912
OtherOS viruses/malware 2.085
This looks very fishy to me. I know there's a large number of DOS
malwares, but 231,000 seems awfully high.
If a given piece of malware is (somehow) catagorized as "DOS" based,
but if it's also a worm (it's got to be something, a worm, virus, etc)
then shouldn't it be put in the "Worm" catagory (and to hell with the
"DOS" label) ?
Not necessarily. He simply didn't break down DOS malwares into
categories. That's not unusual in some large scale tests.
I have no idea how he selected "DOS malwares". IMO it would have
been wrong and misleading to include Windows command line programs
since they aren't DOS programs (can't be run in DOS). Somehow I don't
think Clementi would do that on purpose. But who knows?
Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
.
- References:
- NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- From: Jones
- Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- From: Virus Guy
- Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- From: kurt wismer
- Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- From: kurt wismer
- Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- From: Art
- Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- From: Virus Guy
- NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- Prev by Date: Re: etrust sees virus where none exists......
- Next by Date: Winlogon accessing the internet
- Previous by thread: Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- Next by thread: Re: NOD32 or AntiVirusKit? Look at Anti-Virus Comparative test.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|