Re: SCR file being posted to usenet (detected by some AV's, but not all)



Adam Piggott wrote:
Virus Guy wrote:
<snip>
BTW, regarding the Total Commander crack that I submitted to VT last
week, it's still the same 3 vendors (Avast, Norman, and Symantec) that
are detecting it as mal-ware.

Explain to me why people who use cracks/key gens should be protected by
anti-virus software?

this thing we're on is called the internet... we're *all* connected to it... ask not for whom the bell tolls...

--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A survey where Wintel wins?
    ... >>use Symantec AntiVirus for Macintosh. ... >>'detecting' and 'having'. ... The CR survey covers the last two ... All of the reports cannot be attributed to this one problem. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: SEP
    ... Neither Symantec or Antivir is detecting the file as ... infection. ... upload it to; ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • Re: SEP
    ... Neither Symantec or Antivir is detecting the file as ... remove rogues too bloody often becuse Symantec filed to recognize the infection before or ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • Re: Worm Notices
    ... >> Symantec Anti-Virus Software Open To Attack ... >> remains unpatched although Symantec has issued an advisory. ... > against a system using this vulnerability. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • final answer...NIS 2004 is a virus itself
    ... Virus-specific Anti-Virus Software ... Beware of Norton Internet Security 2004 My ... Symantec suggested I go the uninstall NIS2003 page on ... >distribution of a destructive virus, ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)