Re: How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- From: Ian Kenefick <ian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:16:06 +0000
rjtrembgeologist@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
You absoluely have to run a virus program and have spyware or adaware
protection at all times.
I disagree. I think at this stage anti-virus programs should be renamed antimalware program and include detection for non viral threats including but not limited to - Spyware & Adware. Kaspersky do it, Symantec do it, ESET do it, Bitdefender etc. do it. Anti-Spyware standalone programs have no future I think. I know this ideology might strike a few nerves... but I think this is the way it should be.
This program is really a firewall that keeps things from intruding onto your computer in the first place.
Yikes :-/ MS Antispyware is a standalone program for detecting malicious software such as spyware. This is not a firewall!! Examples of a firewall are: The one included with Windows XP SP2, Zonealarm, Sygate (RIP), Sunbelt Kerio etc.
-- Ian Kenefick http://www.ik-cs.com ian@xxxxxxxxx .
- References:
- How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- From: louise
- Re: How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- From: rjtrembgeologist
- How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- Prev by Date: Re: How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- Next by Date: Re: How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- Previous by thread: Re: How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- Next by thread: Re: How much "protection" needs to be running all the time?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|