Re: NAV 2006 at 50mb versus KAV 3.5133 at 2.588mb


"slartyb" <slartyb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jtbso1pf3dp33kbalr0vb7mqsnrlo09glj@xxxxxxxxxx
>I got a shock the other day, i saw a xp nav 2006 installation, and i
> roughly worked out the ram usage by the various nav services, it was
> about 50mb,
>
> On my personal xp pro home machine running KAV 3.1533 in monitor mode
> it was 2.588 mb.
>
> Kav 35133 is and will remain a classic we will remember fondly for
> years to come.
>
> long live kav 35133
>
> ban rectum thermometers

What about clock cycles? How does it treat the processor?

(Anyone know where old versions of Kav can be found off hand?
Kaspersky official site are up to version 5.0)




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: NAV 2006 at 50mb versus KAV 3.5133 at 2.588mb
    ... Ron Lopshire wrote: ... > louise wrote: ... >>> I got a shock the other day, i saw a xp nav 2006 installation, and i ... >>> On my personal xp pro home machine running KAV 3.1533 in monitor mode ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • NAV 2006 at 50mb versus KAV 3.5133 at 2.588mb
    ... I got a shock the other day, i saw a xp nav 2006 installation, and i ... roughly worked out the ram usage by the various nav services, ... On my personal xp pro home machine running KAV 3.1533 in monitor mode ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • Re: Tiny Vs. Outpost?
    ... NIS comes with NAV 8.0 arguably the ... >>>antivirus product in the world. ... I think my KAV is better, ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Tiny Vs. Outpost?
    ... NIS comes with NAV 8.0 arguably the best ... >>antivirus product in the world. ... I think my KAV is better, ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • its not sasser
    ... since three days my computer has been shutting down from time to time, ... seems like it's the sasser worm; it's not, because either NAV or KAV (both ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)