Re: Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- From: "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:33:33 GMT
Colin O'Scopy wrote:
In article <jD3Ke.6367$EX.1544@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, a.nony.mous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
Haven't used Outlook in a long time, but I don't remember that it has an option to read in plain text.
Depends on version. 2002, 2003 have it. Can't remember about 2000.
Thanks. Heh, I have an old O97 version, which I wouldn't use for email anyway. Personally, I think Outlook is a business application, suitable for use in a corporate environment, but way overkill for home use. <g>
-- -bts -This space intentionally left blank. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- From: Colin O'Scopy
- Re: Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- References:
- Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- From: louise
- Re: Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- From: Beauregard T. Shagnasty
- Re: Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- From: Colin O'Scopy
- Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- Prev by Date: Re: NIS Automatic Liveupdate options problem
- Next by Date: Re: NOD32 memory usage
- Previous by thread: Re: Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- Next by thread: Re: Webmail "safer" than Outlook?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading