Re: ceme pstats
- From: "Tex" <pearland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:03:29 -0500
Maybe we'll agree to disagree on that - the PID is as easy to install as
another pstat. Plus, you do it once & most likely you'll never have to mess
with it again. Put in another pstat & you'll probably have to do it again in
a couple of years.
--
Enjoy!
Robert (Tex) Harmon
http://tinyurl.com/mb4uj - My coffee pages.
http://tinyurl.com/2j8jur - Gaggia User's Group
http://tinyurl.com/235dfr - BUG is Bunn User's Group (espresso)
http://tinyurl.com/pcqbh5 - HX User's Group
"Neal Reid" <NealReid@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NealReid-BA9A36.21591002072009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <YoudnchvX-cPitDXnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Tex" <pearland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No flames for a serious question. Why not replace the pstat with a PID?Because I don't want to? The only redeeming virtue of a PID in an HX
Much
more reliable and it makes the machine a lot quieter. Very simple mod!
machine (that I can thing of at the moment) is replacing the (wearable)
pstat contacts,
Much easier to replace a pstat...
.
- References:
- ceme pstats
- From: Neal Reid
- Re: ceme pstats
- From: Tex
- Re: ceme pstats
- From: Neal Reid
- ceme pstats
- Prev by Date: Re: ceme pstats
- Next by Date: Re: Coffee Fiction
- Previous by thread: Re: ceme pstats
- Next by thread: Re: ceme pstats
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|