Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- From: "Bertie Doe" <montebrasite4@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:19:54 +0100
<RoqueJa> wrote in message
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:29:36 +0100, "Bertie Doe"wrote:
And, the fact remains. Dave has excellent references for his work. No
one has ever complained about Dave on that count. For all the bitching
and moaning about Dave, you would think that if someone had a
legitimate gripe other than the perceived spamming, we'd all know it.
And what do you think the reaction would be, if they dared to criticise him
in this forum? No body cares how much he earns via spamming. It's the fact
that he feels he should be the sole spammer of goods and services in
alt.coffee. I haven't heard any complaints about Tex's work either, other
than from Dave and his socks.
Bertie
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- From: lockjaw
- Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- References:
- Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- From: notbob
- Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- From: alan
- Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- From: Bertie Doe
- Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- Prev by Date: Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719 poor dear bertie.
- Next by Date: Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719 poor dear bertie.
- Previous by thread: Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- Next by thread: Re: AC Stats - week ending 20080719
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|