Re: I-Roast 2 - what's with all the fuss?
- From: "JAY PEASLEY" <jpeasley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:06:05 GMT
I think the fuss is though the iRoast has a programmable interface, it still
is a toy of an interface. From true process control position, it doesn't
come close to that definition. It still is 'Kentucky windage' at best.
Let me explain.
From a process control definition, one would have beginning and endingtemperature setpoints and a time to accomplish them. This sets up a ramp,
either up or down, for the controller to follow. In heat treatment, where my
experience comes from, there may be many ramps, both up and down, to achieve
a particular crystalline structure. Then the heat controller, a PID
controller, would adjust the output to the heater to achieve the ramp based
on a thermocouple(s) within the load. Most don't know what PID stands for.
The output of a PID algorithm is based on the sum of three separate
equations; the P or proportional component, which means how far is the
actual temperature from the setpoint. The I or integral calculates how long
and far the temp is from setpoint and will continue to build if the temp
lags the setpoint for any length of time. And the D or derivate, looks at
how fast the temp is rising or cooling and makes a negative adjustment so
the temperature doesn't overshoot the setpoint.
If the iRoast was truly programmable or the engineers at Heathware
understood process control, then the interface would use ambient temp for
the beginning setpoint and then each segment temp would be the end
temperature setpoint and the time programmed in would create the ramp. They
would also put a thermocouple in the beans to really know what was
happening. Then roasts would be truly repeatable and one could truly nuance
the best or desirable qualities out of the beans.
As far as I can tell, the temp controller is strictly 'I' or integral. It
slowly build to setpoint and it takes a long time to overshoot. Then I don't
know what it does. My kill-a-watt meter jumps all over the place when it
overshoots. The fan usage should be more controllable also. Right now it is
on high for 3 minute OR below 390F OR if the temp is way above setpoint and
it panics and turns the fan on.
Given that, I don't know if the iRoast is built to really follow a ramp and
do true programmability. What we get may be a compromise so the unit doesn't
end up in a puddle like some toon from Roger Rabbit. For $175US it does a
lot, but it could do a lot, lot more.
Jay
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I-Roast 2 - what's with all the fuss?
- From: FBean
- Re: I-Roast 2 - what's with all the fuss?
- References:
- I-Roast 2 - what's with all the fuss?
- From: nshore1
- I-Roast 2 - what's with all the fuss?
- Prev by Date: Re: Storing Coffee Beans??
- Next by Date: Re: "Timer" coffee taste strange??
- Previous by thread: Re: I-Roast 2 - what's with all the fuss?
- Next by thread: Re: I-Roast 2 - what's with all the fuss?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading