Re: Oxygen, CO2, homebrewers and homeroasters
- From: jim schulman <jim_schulman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:11:19 GMT
On 24 Jan 2006 12:23:20 -0800, "Alan" <munter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>With beer and wine, in the food science world, loads of companies have
>done extensive analysis like HPLC to determine exactly what chemicals
>make up the various flavor components and what different fermentation
>temperatures do to the finished composition. Has that kind of research
>been done with coffee beans to tweak the final result?
A great deal of research has been done, and about 1200 flavor
compounds have been id'ed in roasted coffee. The problem is that the
research is mostly financed by the big four, and the emphahsis is
always on how to get very cheap, very lousy coffee to taste
acceptable, rather than on what distinguishes great coffees from
merely good ones.
Although science is science; the engineering involved to prevent
steamed robusta from staling to the point it becomes "unacceptable to
the average R&G (roast and ground) consumer" is rather different from
that involved to keep the bloom on an yrg or hue-hue. The
parenthetical tirades in Sivetz's book from the 70s, "Coffee
Technology," which is a guilt ridden manual on how to produce R&G and
soluble (instant) coffee, underlines the distinction (and provides
some insight into why Sivetz is so ornery today -- former smoker
syndrome).
--
jim schulman
<jim_schulman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.
- References:
- Oxygen, CO2, homebrewers and homeroasters
- From: Alan
- Re: Oxygen, CO2, homebrewers and homeroasters
- From: Randy G .
- Re: Oxygen, CO2, homebrewers and homeroasters
- From: Alan
- Oxygen, CO2, homebrewers and homeroasters
- Prev by Date: Re: Is D. Schomer's 'Techniques of the Barista' video worth it?
- Next by Date: Re: Starbucks Doubleshot in a can
- Previous by thread: Re: Oxygen, CO2, homebrewers and homeroasters
- Next by thread: Re: Oxygen, CO2, homebrewers and homeroasters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading