Re: Google Earth
- From: "DougW" <post.replies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:06:19 -0500
Scott Marquardt did pass the time by typing:
> myron opined thusly on Sep 25:
>> I am curious if anyone here uses Google earth and thought of locating
>> Coffee plantations, placemarking them, adding photos or overlays.
>>
>> I wouldn't know where to start..this might be a cool project..(maybe
>> kinda difficult as we are talking plants and not buildings, and the
>> resolution of GE at these spots might not be the greatest..
>>
>> best, myron
>
> Yeah, I was thinking the same thing a while back (I'm I.T. in a private
> school system, and this is the year we're installing GE and urging our
> teachers to use it in a big way).
>
> Unfortunately, what's happening in a lot of cases is that people are taking
> pains to create static KML files, often using the Earth interface to enter
> data. This is likely because Google's free version doesn't allow ready
> import of data, so people are left to "do the best that they can." Google
> should consider that they're probably precipitating less than ideal
> evolution of their product by this means.
>
> Better, of course, is to database it all so that either KML/KMZ files can
> be produced on demand (and are up-to-date), or far better, to expose such
> databases to network links in GE, so the data are always live, fresh, and
> (depending on how the server-side is implemented) bandwidth-economical.
>
> The question as with any data job is this: where is -- or where should be
> -- the source of authoritative information? Who will maintain it? What
> protocols will be in place for not only entry, but more importantly,
> updates and changes?
>
> If anyone's going to do this, it should be databased. I might be willing to
> do that, though it'll be a while before I'd have any time to code a front
> end for the BBOX GETs coming from GE to the server. And I do mean a while!
Well, the kml file is the most logical location, it's a straight forward
html-ish text file. Never looked at the kmz that close, but I assume it's a
more comressed version. (probably pkzipped by the looks of it)
If you save your file as a kml, close GE, then open the kml
with notepad you will see how it's formatted. Then stick something
like this inbetween existing <placemark></placemark> code
<Placemark>
<name>groom lake</name>
<LookAt>
<longitude>-115.8126382174268</longitude>
<latitude>37.25512234152102</latitude>
<range>20103.15543326131</range>
<tilt>0.2080558487320975</tilt>
<heading>-5.405135213921768</heading>
</LookAt>
<styleUrl>root://styleMaps#default+nicon=0x307+hicon=0x317</styleUrl>
<Point>
<coordinates>-115.8126382174268,37.25512234152102,0</coordinates>
</Point>
</Placemark>
Now save the kml, start GE, and load that file.
It's not elegant.
--
DougW
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Google Earth
- From: Scott Marquardt
- Re: Google Earth
- References:
- Re: Google Earth
- From: Scott Marquardt
- Re: Google Earth
- Prev by Date: Franke Ecolino on eBay
- Next by Date: Re: SCAA Financial Crisis
- Previous by thread: Re: Google Earth
- Next by thread: Re: Google Earth
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|