Re: Revised Cust Agreement
- From: "Frankster" <Frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:46:53 -0600
"Frankster" <Frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:55ednQEbd8r31DnZnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"jk" <kend99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e2e8a25e19bam1969bbtk7b3ef68ppmchd@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:55:16 GMT, Lou@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Received a revised CA in the mail - with my bill.
Anyone read this thing, and really understand what it is all about?
Lou
I did. As a result of a class action suit VZW will no longer apply
minutes used in a previous months billing cycle (delayed billing) to
the billing cycle in which they appear on the bill. Example you made
50 minutes of calls in May which did not appear on your bill until
June. The 50 minutes will be applied to your allowable minutes in May
NOT in June. If the 50 minutes did not put you over your allowed May
minutes then you would not be charged extra. The way it was before
the suit: if the 50 minutes you used in May were delay billed in June
and they put you over your allowed June minutes then you would be
charged.
Thanks, jk.
It's nice to know that VZW is being so nice and putting us customers first
by changing this. Not to mention the whole Moto 710 thingy. Thanks VZW.
Or... could it have been the two lawsuits? Naw.... they probably would
have taken care of us anyway. :)
-Frank
Oh yeah, also, great work VZW on the recent relaxation of early termination
fees. I know that probably would have been done anyway without the lawsuit
too. LOL!
-Frank
.
- References:
- Revised Cust Agreement
- From: Lou
- Re: Revised Cust Agreement
- From: Frankster
- Revised Cust Agreement
- Prev by Date: Re: Revised Cust Agreement
- Next by Date: Re: Verizon to ease termination fees
- Previous by thread: Re: Revised Cust Agreement
- Next by thread: Re: Revised Cust Agreement
- Index(es):