Re: More fees for Ohio Customers
- From: Joe Makowiec <makowiec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:20:45 GMT
On 30 Jan 2006 in alt.cellular.verizon, Justin wrote:
> Joe Makowiec wrote on [Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:30:15 GMT]:
>> On 29 Jan 2006 in alt.cellular.verizon, Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Who decides if this is a "material" change or not? The service is
>>> awesome but the fees and changes in the terms are getting really
>>> old.
>>
>> You got a landline phone? My latest bill:
>>
>> Verizon services: $26.31
>> 'Surcharges and taxes': $20.67
>> Total: $46.98
>>
>> Put another way, 'Surcharges and taxes' are running at 78.6% of
>> what I'm paying for. NPR (Marketplace, maybe?) pointed out in the
>> past day or so that one of the taxes/surcharges/user fees/whatever
>> on telephone bills dates back to the Spanish American War!
>
> Are you trying to say 20.67 is 78.6% of 46.98? Or that the
> surcharges are 76.8% of the service charges?
Verizon services are what I'm paying for.
--
Joe Makowiec
http://makowiec.org/
Email: http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe
.
- References:
- More fees for Ohio Customers
- From: Scott
- Re: More fees for Ohio Customers
- From: Joe Makowiec
- More fees for Ohio Customers
- Prev by Date: Re: Razr V3c warning: lock can be bypassed
- Next by Date: Re: N.D. to Test Balloons for Cellular Service (OT)
- Previous by thread: Re: More fees for Ohio Customers
- Next by thread: Re: More fees for Ohio Customers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|