Re: More Ohio charges
- From: "Scott" <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:20:25 -0500
I know. For some reason the msg was in my Outbox again and OE reposted.
I read your msg on the orig posting. Ohio is ridiculous with taxes and our
surrouding states are having a good time attracting our businesses and
families.
"George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pKOdnRlMsYZQmUDenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Scott wrote:
>> Who decides if this is a "material" change or not? The service is
>> awesome but the fees , regardless of how small, and changes in the terms
>> are getting really old.
>>
>> Attention Ohio Customers
>> In February we'll begin collecting a .11 percent surcharge to
>> recover
>> our cost of an assessment imposed by the OH PUC. It will appear in the
>> Verizon
>> Wireless Surcharges section of your bill as OH REG FEE. This Verizon
>> Wireless charge is
>> not a tax and is subject to change. Please refer to "Our Rights To Make
>> Changes" in
>> your Customer Agreement for information about changes.
>>
>>
>>
> You already started a thread with the exact post hours ago and received
> replies.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Ohio charges
- From: Clark W. Griswold, Jr.
- Re: More Ohio charges
- References:
- More Ohio charges
- From: Scott
- Re: More Ohio charges
- From: George
- More Ohio charges
- Prev by Date: Re: Free Directory Calls
- Next by Date: Re: New Verizon Wireless Plans Soon?
- Previous by thread: Re: More Ohio charges
- Next by thread: Re: More Ohio charges
- Index(es):