METRO PCS SERVICE IN SF BETTER THAN VERIZON

From: "vxxtribune@xxxxxxx" <vxxtribune@xxxxxxx>
Date: 22 Nov 2005 19:11:34 -0800

I do not work for Metro PCS, I am a Verizon user as well as a Metro PCS
user. I need Verizon because Metro only works in the Bay Area. The
quality of Metro is better than Verizon from my experience. For 40.00 I
can call anywhere. Can't beat it.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: METRO PCS SERVICE IN SF BETTER THAN VERIZON
  - From: SMS

Prev by Date: Re: LG VX6100 USB datacable drivers
Next by Date: Verizon ruins the Nokia 6256i
Previous by thread: verizon 411 listing
Next by thread: Re: METRO PCS SERVICE IN SF BETTER THAN VERIZON
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Verizon sucks? What else is new??!
... Been a Verizon customer for 6 years. ... but it won't matter because the network sucks. ... Sprint and T-Mobile? ... Metro PCS? ...
(alt.cellular.verizon)
Re: METRO PCS SERVICE IN SF BETTER THAN VERIZON
... the use of two phones for me is an advantage. ... and I use T-Mobile for travel 39.99. ... for Verizon and 4,000 minutes. ... and at least in the area I use the phone Metro PCS is of far better ...
(alt.cellular.verizon)
Re: Before I do something stupid
... Is this error coming when you try to send mail via Outlook using the Verizon address? ... "Johnson Perry" wrote in message ... mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The forwarding function is created in the Verizon user ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)