Re: Why ask Why.....
- From: David S <dwstreeter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:12:41 GMT
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:09:43 GMT, Raymond Arritt
<raymondarritt@xxxxxxxxxxx> chose to add this to the great equation of
life, the universe, and everything:
>J wrote:
>
>>> Yes I know that, but he didn't mention not getting a number, just not
>>> getting a name. Some people think that caller ID on cellphones works like
>>> it does on landlines, but of course it doesn't.
>
>Why "of course"? Just curious... I never realized it was a different
>technology.
It's not a different technology. Going back to the originating carrier for
the name costs the receiving carrier extra money and VZW is too cheap to
pay it.
--
David Streeter, "an internet god" -- Dave Barry
http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
"Firms remember their employees
Some hand out bogus checks and others present gifts"
- headline in the 'Philadelphia Record'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why ask Why.....
- From: Remove This
- Re: Why ask Why.....
- References:
- Why ask Why.....
- From: Remove This
- Re: Why ask Why.....
- From: Bob the Printer
- Re: Why ask Why.....
- From: J
- Re: Why ask Why.....
- From: Bob the Printer
- Re: Why ask Why.....
- From: J
- Re: Why ask Why.....
- From: Raymond Arritt
- Why ask Why.....
- Prev by Date: Re: Re-using old non-GPS phones verboten
- Next by Date: Re: e815
- Previous by thread: Re: Why ask Why.....
- Next by thread: Re: Why ask Why.....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|