Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Kurt <labolide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:45:24 -0700
In article <0in8u39p996e9rtuk8k26lkgdni3pnbj6q@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Jeffrey Kaplan <nomail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Previously on alt.cellular.cingular, Kurt said:Yes.
The Treo is bigger.I think most phones are at least fatter.
What phone out there is actually thinner? Without case, of course (no
external case on mine- Invisi-shield)
In the same class? At least one Blackberry is smaller overall.
So none thinner?
Thinner is the key. iPhone easier to slip in and out of pocket. Treo was
bulky.
--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Jeffrey Kaplan
- Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- References:
- Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Jeffrey Kaplan
- Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Kurt
- Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Todd All***
- Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Jeffrey Kaplan
- Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Kurt
- Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- From: Jeffrey Kaplan
- Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- Prev by Date: New iphone 2.0
- Next by Date: Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- Previous by thread: Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- Next by thread: Re: Clamshell vs candybar (Was: Re: Clamshell iPhone on the way)
- Index(es):