Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent

Charles <fort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> amazed us all with the following
in news:210120081505352479%fort@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

In article <OB6lj.761$hI1.415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kevin Weaver
<kevinkeithweaver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Google is your friend. Try it sometime.
It's been posted here many time's when Navas 1st shot off his trap
about the very same thing.

Being posted here does not make it a fact. It is just something you
would like to be true. As Navas says the story from Verizon sounds
like sour grapes.

If Verizon could have had the iPhone and turned it down then in my
opinion they made a mistake.

Why? When comparing Verizon and AT&T, the iPhone does not appear to be
giving AT&T any competitive advantage. Verizon keeps up in terms of net
adds, and shows a much higher profit per subscriber.


I don't think it would ever have been in
the cards though for Verizon to get it unless Cingular had turned it
down. They would want the GSM carrier because of the global market.

Except for the fact that it is well documented that they went to Verizon
first. Despite your delusions and inability to accept the fact, VERZION
TURNED DOWN APPLE!





.

Relevant Pages