Re: Verizon improves churn, but still #2 to AT&T/Cingular
- From: Scott <how.do@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:01:37 -0500
John Navas <spamfilter1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:j1ik3354l8i704h1t6k27n38vjclp4eetc@xxxxxxx:
On Wed, 02 May 2007 16:01:10 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <46391835$0$27255$742ec2ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Andy S wrote:
You need to watch "http://tinyurl.com/22d4a9"; in order to understand
the
difference between AT&T and at&t.
No. You were right the first time. It's AT&T. It's only at&t if
it's accompanied by the globe.
Ah, so they only use lower case in the logo. Maybe it was cheaper to
use only lower case letters.
Whatever. The important thing to remember is that whatever the logo,
it didn't help them much in terms of customer additions or ARPU.
In your opinion. Most observers think the AT&T name gives the company
a significant boost.
Such as who? You don't count- we need something from someone other than an
average user such as yourself.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Verizon improves churn, but still #2 to AT&T/Cingular
- Next by Date: Re: Verizon improves churn, but still #2 to AT&T/Cingular
- Previous by thread: Re: Verizon improves churn, but still #2 to AT&T/Cingular
- Next by thread: Why does cingular make it hard to make your last payment?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
