Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: "Scott" <how.do@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:00:33 -0600
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:landd212oftgptbc9u00qb1aobrda9eah8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:23:05 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <44d6a407$0$96234$742ec2ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:
This is what I was wondering. The 'world phone' thing might be what I
was seeing. But a SIM-based CDMA device would be pretty nice too (if
possible). If one phone goes T.U., just move the chip.
I've changed phones on CDMA. It takes about two minutes to do it online.
It would be nice to store contacts on the SIM, but as I understand it,
not all phones allow you to choose between storing in the phones memory
versus storing on the SIM.
You understand wrong.
No- it looks like you were worng- again.
.
- References:
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: Sam
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: Kevin K
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: SMS
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: John Navas
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: SMS
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- From: John Navas
- Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- Prev by Date: Re: New TDMA charge
- Next by Date: Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- Previous by thread: Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- Next by thread: Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|