Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: John Navas <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:15:25 GMT
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 04:03:41 -0400, "Sam" <foobar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<SDEyg.1293$Bd.1117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Big deal allowing customers to keep their phones and phone number. They
are the customers to keep in the first place. They bought and paid for
the phones and number portability has been required for several years now.
It makes no sense to keep unprofitable customers.
True. But isn't like we don't have a fixed account receivable business
model here. I mean, contract or no contract, you still pay monthly fees. So
every customer is profitable.
Not true. There is a real "opportunity cost" of service, and low
revenue customers can in fact be unprofitable.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: SMS
- Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: Dave
- Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: John Navas
- Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: Sam
- Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- Prev by Date: Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- Next by Date: Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- Previous by thread: Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, dueto 50% policy
- Next by thread: Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
