Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: "Sam" <foobar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:41:41 -0400
"John Navas" <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
SoTrue. But isn't like we don't have a fixed account receivable business
model here. I mean, contract or no contract, you still pay monthly fees.
every customer is profitable.
Not true. There is a real "opportunity cost" of service, and low
revenue customers can in fact be unprofitable.
This applies to nearly everything. Exclusive time (hence dollars) can be
lost when products and services are not optimally allocated at the highest
potential/profitable consumer.
So what are we really talking about here about "Opportunistic Cost"?
Bandwidth allocation for the non-contractual and/or lower tier customers?
Are we back to net neutrality issues? Service contacts also gives you
better estimate of long term profits margins and that is always great for
stock holders.
---
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: SMS
- Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: Dave
- Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: John Navas
- Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: Sam
- Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- From: John Navas
- Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- Prev by Date: Re: Comparing Verizon vs Cingular
- Next by Date: Re: When will Cingular Stop the False Advertising?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- Next by thread: Re: Cingular dropping more customers that they sold service to, due to 50% policy
- Index(es):