Re: CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
- From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:50:40 -0500
SMS <scharf.steven@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
In alt.cellular.cingular John Navas <spamfilter0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CHARTER:
WHY DO YOU INSIST ON POSTING THIS CHARTER TO A GROUP THAT THIS IS NOT A
CHARTER FOR? KNOCK IT OFF!
Most of Navas's posts are written to annoy people. Judging from your all
caps response, it look like he succeeded. I suggest that you use your
newsreader's filtering capability to avoid the temptation to respond to
his posts.
If he wasn't taking the arrogant approach to post a cingular group charter to
an attws group (which isn't bound by that charter in any way), I would gladly
killfile him, but doing so leaves him posting there. At least making noise
about it makes me feel better as it doesn't manage to make him follow the
spirit of his own post, which is to post relavent material.
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
- From: SMS
- Re: CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
- References:
- Re: CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
- From: SMS
- Re: CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
- Prev by Date: Re: Best Reception (Clamshell Bluetooth)
- Next by Date: Re: Sony Ericsson K800i
- Previous by thread: Re: CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
- Next by thread: Re: CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|