Re: Article re CELCOs clamping down on 'unlimited'

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:24:29 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <448f1ef8$0$96945$742ec2ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

GomJabbar wrote:
John Navas wrote:

When you're shilling for Verizon, you have to use Scharf math.

Actually I'm shilling for ZDNET (did ya see the link? did ya? did ya?).

The ZDNET link provides the facts regarding high speed data coverage.
The last thing Navas is interested in is the facts.

Your attempt to libel me simply because I rebut your fabrications is
pretty pathetic.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Article re CELCOs clamping down on unlimited
    ... The ZDNET link provides the facts regarding high speed data coverage. ...
    (alt.cellular.cingular)
  • Re: GPECC, USPS and JR
    ... I am aware that a big company like JR doesn't need me shilling for them ... >but facts is facts: they made good in spiffy time and I remain a happy ... better customer service than its competitors. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)